<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mathrick no PATANKO PRESS!</title>
	<link>http://mathrick.org/blog</link>
	<description>Our software is not patent cucumbered</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Brooks Moses</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102730</link>
		<author>Brooks Moses</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102730</guid>
					<description>Thomas @11: It's like spam, though.  "Opt-out with documentation of how to opt out" is not a valid substitute for opt-in.

This is because it's a failure of one of the major rules of user interfaces: The amount of documentation that the user needs to read should be (a) minimized, (b) no more than an amount proportional to the amount of complexity of the result that they want, and (c) clearly related to what the user wants to do.  A "MoinMoin will do this complex thing that requires lots of work to set up right, unless you read the documentation to tell it not to" setup clearly violates those rules -- a user who wants a simple wiki should not need to read documentation on how to set up language-dependent behavior, and should not need to go through the effort of disabling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas @11: It&#8217;s like spam, though.  &#8220;Opt-out with documentation of how to opt out&#8221; is not a valid substitute for opt-in.</p>
<p>This is because it&#8217;s a failure of one of the major rules of user interfaces: The amount of documentation that the user needs to read should be (a) minimized, (b) no more than an amount proportional to the amount of complexity of the result that they want, and (c) clearly related to what the user wants to do.  A &#8220;MoinMoin will do this complex thing that requires lots of work to set up right, unless you read the documentation to tell it not to&#8221; setup clearly violates those rules &#8212; a user who wants a simple wiki should not need to read documentation on how to set up language-dependent behavior, and should not need to go through the effort of disabling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Satoshi Tanabe</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102551</link>
		<author>Satoshi Tanabe</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102551</guid>
					<description>日本語でもやってみたら、言われたとおりの結果になりました。ひどいですね、MoinMoin。

UI についても一言一句賛成です。どうして大きなプロジェクト（e.g. Mercurial）が MoinMoin を使うのかほんとに不思議。たぶん Python で書かれているからなんでしょうが、これは Python にとってネガティブな宣伝ですよね。

いい記事なので、あとで僕のブログで翻訳させてもらうかもしれません。

Hope you understood my Japanese. それでは。

- Satoshi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>日本語でもやってみたら、言われたとおりの結果になりました。ひどいですね、MoinMoin。</p>
<p>UI についても一言一句賛成です。どうして大きなプロジェクト（e.g. Mercurial）が MoinMoin を使うのかほんとに不思議。たぶん Python で書かれているからなんでしょうが、これは Python にとってネガティブな宣伝ですよね。</p>
<p>いい記事なので、あとで僕のブログで翻訳させてもらうかもしれません。</p>
<p>Hope you understood my Japanese. それでは。</p>
<p>- Satoshi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Thomas Waldmann</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102544</link>
		<author>Thomas Waldmann</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102544</guid>
					<description>A fool with a tool is still a fool.

I won't go into details about some wrong and some true stuff you wrote as this is not the place to discuss about moin, just one thing:

You complain about moin's way of doing i18n, but it simply is the admin who has configured it wrong for his application and obviously has not read the configuration help pages (HelpOnLanguages, HelpOnConfiguration).

Since 1 or 2 years moin even has HelpOnLanguages as default front page to avoid that misconfiguration. And guess what -  some people ask us why they get that as front page instead of just reading it.

So for that, you're beating a dead horse.

And btw, pointing to a misconfigured site with a stoneage moin 1.3 install is not quite the best example for a moin site. Obviously the admin didn't care when installing it and does not care about maintaining / updating it either.

If you need more bad stuff to rant about: the are many unmaintained (moin) wikis with lots of spam in them - because admin and users don't care. Now blame moin for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fool with a tool is still a fool.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into details about some wrong and some true stuff you wrote as this is not the place to discuss about moin, just one thing:</p>
<p>You complain about moin&#8217;s way of doing i18n, but it simply is the admin who has configured it wrong for his application and obviously has not read the configuration help pages (HelpOnLanguages, HelpOnConfiguration).</p>
<p>Since 1 or 2 years moin even has HelpOnLanguages as default front page to avoid that misconfiguration. And guess what -  some people ask us why they get that as front page instead of just reading it.</p>
<p>So for that, you&#8217;re beating a dead horse.</p>
<p>And btw, pointing to a misconfigured site with a stoneage moin 1.3 install is not quite the best example for a moin site. Obviously the admin didn&#8217;t care when installing it and does not care about maintaining / updating it either.</p>
<p>If you need more bad stuff to rant about: the are many unmaintained (moin) wikis with lots of spam in them - because admin and users don&#8217;t care. Now blame moin for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by mathrick</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102527</link>
		<author>mathrick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102527</guid>
					<description>No, I'm not. 100% of my contact with Trac has come through software projects, and every time I wished a fiery death upon whoever put the default content in. It makes finding the real information 10x harder because you can't just look for spots where something is written. As I said, help is good, but it &lt;b&gt;must&lt;/b&gt; be marked as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;m not. 100% of my contact with Trac has come through software projects, and every time I wished a fiery death upon whoever put the default content in. It makes finding the real information 10x harder because you can&#8217;t just look for spots where something is written. As I said, help is good, but it <b>must</b> be marked as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Cezar</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102525</link>
		<author>Cezar</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102525</guid>
					<description>Trac isn't supposed to be used to make a wiki on Guinea Pigs. It's ment for code. The help being in the wiki has helped me on multiple occasions with Trac by allowing me to add to the help. While you maybe right about general wiki software not needing the help built in, you are wrong about it's place in Trac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trac isn&#8217;t supposed to be used to make a wiki on Guinea Pigs. It&#8217;s ment for code. The help being in the wiki has helped me on multiple occasions with Trac by allowing me to add to the help. While you maybe right about general wiki software not needing the help built in, you are wrong about it&#8217;s place in Trac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by mathrick</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102524</link>
		<author>mathrick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102524</guid>
					<description>Jeps, kunne læse det fint. Mit dansk er ikke perfekt, men nok for at drive mit eget firma :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeps, kunne læse det fint. Mit dansk er ikke perfekt, men nok for at drive mit eget firma :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by David Christiansen</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102520</link>
		<author>David Christiansen</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102520</guid>
					<description>Det er ret tosset at holde folk uden for det rigtige indhold hvis ikke de har det rigtige sprog i deres browsere.

I hope you could read that. Can't really tell how much Danish you've learned so far :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Det er ret tosset at holde folk uden for det rigtige indhold hvis ikke de har det rigtige sprog i deres browsere.</p>
<p>I hope you could read that. Can&#8217;t really tell how much Danish you&#8217;ve learned so far :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Igal</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102519</link>
		<author>Igal</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102519</guid>
					<description>Broken in Hebrew too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broken in Hebrew too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by The Gay Bar</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102518</link>
		<author>The Gay Bar</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102518</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;The C++ of Wikis...&lt;/strong&gt;

In an article criticising the wiki engine MoinMoin I just read a great statement:
I realised that it’s the C++ of wikis — not only will it not solve your problems, it will cause new ones that will make you long for your original ones.

I love th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The C++ of Wikis&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In an article criticising the wiki engine MoinMoin I just read a great statement:<br />
I realised that it’s the C++ of wikis — not only will it not solve your problems, it will cause new ones that will make you long for your original ones.</p>
<p>I love th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by terry</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102517</link>
		<author>terry</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102517</guid>
					<description>Wikis make fucking terrible web pages anyway and should be avoided at absolutely all costs.

Look  at Wikipedia even, utterly useless interface and search system, the best way to navigate wikipedia is fucking google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikis make fucking terrible web pages anyway and should be avoided at absolutely all costs.</p>
<p>Look  at Wikipedia even, utterly useless interface and search system, the best way to navigate wikipedia is fucking google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by wingo</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102516</link>
		<author>wingo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102516</guid>
					<description>An enjoyable rant :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An enjoyable rant :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by mathrick</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102515</link>
		<author>mathrick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102515</guid>
					<description>Thanks, but from a quick look, it seems that the translation is complete, but links back to the English frontpage (ie. "not self-contained") above. Is that correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, but from a quick look, it seems that the translation is complete, but links back to the English frontpage (ie. &#8220;not self-contained&#8221;) above. Is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoinMoin considered harmful by Till</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102505</link>
		<author>Till</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/05/08/moinmoin-considered-harmful/#comment-102505</guid>
					<description>Works (not so) fine with German. Means: using Geman as language reproduces the effect you speak about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works (not so) fine with German. Means: using Geman as language reproduces the effect you speak about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Incredilble by Hochzeitskleider</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2005/11/25/incredilble/#comment-96762</link>
		<author>Hochzeitskleider</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2005/11/25/incredilble/#comment-96762</guid>
					<description>Now I think we have the next step in Spamming.. I visit a company in china, they hire a lot of people doing “Spam-Comments” hours by hours.. they don`t speak english, but they can type picture codes in.. So I think best way is to give sentences with a task to solve, so if someone don`t speak english, he can not solve it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I think we have the next step in Spamming.. I visit a company in china, they hire a lot of people doing “Spam-Comments” hours by hours.. they don`t speak english, but they can type picture codes in.. So I think best way is to give sentences with a task to solve, so if someone don`t speak english, he can not solve it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CGI-Lisp 0.5 by Dimitry Gashinsky</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2007/11/12/cgi-lisp-05/#comment-90725</link>
		<author>Dimitry Gashinsky</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2007/11/12/cgi-lisp-05/#comment-90725</guid>
					<description>I am having difficulty in making the POST and cookies to work. Everything else is working. I've just tried running the hunchentoot test and post does not work.

Did you have any chance to try the /hunchentoot/test/parameter_latin1_post.html?

Thank you for a great hack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having difficulty in making the POST and cookies to work. Everything else is working. I&#8217;ve just tried running the hunchentoot test and post does not work.</p>
<p>Did you have any chance to try the /hunchentoot/test/parameter_latin1_post.html?</p>
<p>Thank you for a great hack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a claim by ken</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85309</link>
		<author>ken</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85309</guid>
					<description>trimtab: Standard Mandarin, which "serves the function of providing a common spoken language between speakers of different and mutually unintelligible Chinese spoken languages - not to mention between the Han Chinese and other ethnic groups in China".

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca#Chinese

Sure, English is also a lingua franca.  Nothing about its definition says there can be only one.  It's an attribute of a language, not a contest between them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trimtab: Standard Mandarin, which &#8220;serves the function of providing a common spoken language between speakers of different and mutually unintelligible Chinese spoken languages - not to mention between the Han Chinese and other ethnic groups in China&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca#Chinese" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca#Chinese</a></p>
<p>Sure, English is also a lingua franca.  Nothing about its definition says there can be only one.  It&#8217;s an attribute of a language, not a contest between them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a claim by trimtab</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85279</link>
		<author>trimtab</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85279</guid>
					<description>@ken: Chinese is a "Lingua Franca"? Chinese is "widely used beyond the population of its native speakers”? First, which Chinese are you referring to? (There are 11 native languages (and many more dialects) spoken in China). I would have thought that English (1.2 billion speakers, native + non-native) was more so than Chinese (0.9 billion speakers, mostly native).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ken: Chinese is a &#8220;Lingua Franca&#8221;? Chinese is &#8220;widely used beyond the population of its native speakers”? First, which Chinese are you referring to? (There are 11 native languages (and many more dialects) spoken in China). I would have thought that English (1.2 billion speakers, native + non-native) was more so than Chinese (0.9 billion speakers, mostly native).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a claim by ken</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85199</link>
		<author>ken</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85199</guid>
					<description>"Java is as much lingua franca as chinese".

Galo, sorry, I must disagree.  Chinese *is* a lingua franca.

Lingua franca does not mean "anyone can understand it", which is trivially false of all languages.  It means "widely used beyond the population of its native speakers", which Chinese definitely is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Java is as much lingua franca as chinese&#8221;.</p>
<p>Galo, sorry, I must disagree.  Chinese *is* a lingua franca.</p>
<p>Lingua franca does not mean &#8220;anyone can understand it&#8221;, which is trivially false of all languages.  It means &#8220;widely used beyond the population of its native speakers&#8221;, which Chinese definitely is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a claim by Galo</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85192</link>
		<author>Galo</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85192</guid>
					<description>I find it very, very hard to believe those people who actually defend Java really believe in themselves. Lingua franca? Java is as much lingua franca as chinese: a lot of people understand it, but still doesn't mean ANYONE can understand it.

And I am sorry if I offended the chinese language (such a beautiful language) by comparing it with the worst invention in programming languages, EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it very, very hard to believe those people who actually defend Java really believe in themselves. Lingua franca? Java is as much lingua franca as chinese: a lot of people understand it, but still doesn&#8217;t mean ANYONE can understand it.</p>
<p>And I am sorry if I offended the chinese language (such a beautiful language) by comparing it with the worst invention in programming languages, EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a claim by Daniel Janus</title>
		<link>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85190</link>
		<author>Daniel Janus</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mathrick.org/blog/archives/2008/01/14/i-am-not-able-to-rightly-comprehend-the-kind-of-confusion-of-ideas-that-could-provoke-such-a-claim/#comment-85190</guid>
					<description>Actually, there is one more way this sort of claim can be dismissed:  When one stumbles upon an application of a Lisp macro he is not familiar with, seeing what is really going on is just as easy as macroexpand-1'ing it (or better yet, hitting C-c RET in slime).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is one more way this sort of claim can be dismissed:  When one stumbles upon an application of a Lisp macro he is not familiar with, seeing what is really going on is just as easy as macroexpand-1&#8242;ing it (or better yet, hitting C-c RET in slime).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
